ArticleCell genomics2025
Recurrent breakpoints in the BRD4 locus reduce toxicity associated with gene amplification.
Article in Cell genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BRD4: From molecular understanding to therapeutics development.Molecular cell · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent work by the ICGC-PCAWG consortium identified recurrent focal deletions in the BRD4 gene, decreasing expression despite increased copy number. We show that these focal deletions occur in the context of cyclin E1 amplification in breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, and serve to disrupt BRD4 regulatory regions and gene expression across isoforms. We analyze open reading frame screen data and find that overexpression of BRD4 long (BRD4-L) and short isoform BRD4-S(a) impairs cell growth across cell lines. We confirm these results in OVSAHO ovarian cancer cells, where the overexpression of BRD4 isoforms significantly reduces tumor growth. Next, we mimic BRD4 focal deletions using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and show that these focal deletions rescue ovarian cancer cells from toxicity associated with BRD4 overexpression, suggesting that BRD4 levels must be fine-tuned for cancer cell proliferation. Our study provides experimental evidence for the first recurrent deletion reducing toxicity in cancer, expanding the landscape of cancer progression mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.