Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40112680›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2025

A subset of cortical areas exhibit adult-like functional network patterns in early childhood.

Jiaxin Cindy Tu, Yu Wang, Xintian Wang, Donna Dierker, Chloe M Sobolewski, Trevor K M Day, Omid Kardan, Óscar Miranda-Domínguez, Lucille A Moore, Eric Feczko and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jiaxin Cindy TuMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Yu WangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Xintian WangMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Donna DierkerMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Chloe M SobolewskiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.
Trevor K M DayMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA; Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA; Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, USA.
Omid KardanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, USA.
Óscar Miranda-DomínguezMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA.
Lucille A MooreMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA.
Eric FeczkoMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA.
Damien A FairMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA; Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Jed T ElisonMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA; Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Evan M GordonMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Timothy O LaumannDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Adam T EggebrechtMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA.
Muriah D WheelockMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA. Electronic address: mdwheelock@wustl.edu.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
UNC/UMN Baby Connectome ProjectU01MH110274 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS, GILMORE, JOHN HORACE · 2016 to 2019
$4.5M
Infant Brain and Behavioral Signatures of Later Emerging Risk for PsychopathologyR01MH104324 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELISON, JED THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Georgetown University Brain and Language Training ProgramT32DC019481 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter Ethan Turkeltaub · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Leveraging pediatric state-specific functional brain network dynamics to predict developmental outcomesR01HD115540 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Muriah D Wheelock · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Innovative biostatistical approaches to network level analyses of connectome-behavior relationshipsR00EB029343 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELOCK, MURIAH D · 2022 to 2024
$955k
Precision Functional Mapping in Treatment-Resistant DepressionR00MH129616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY OTTO LAUMANN · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Precision Functional Mapping in Treatment-Resistant DepressionK99MH129616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LAUMANN, TIMOTHY OTTO · 2022 to 2023
$292k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB029343NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD115540NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC019481NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH129616NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH129616NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104324NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH110274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human cerebral cortex contains groups of areas that support sensory, motor, cognitive, and affective functions, often categorized into functional networks. These networks show stronger internal and weaker external functional connectivity (FC), with FC profiles more similar within the same network. Previous studies have shown these networks develop from nascent forms before birth to their mature, adult-like structures in childhood. However, these analyses often rely on adult functional network definitions. This study assesses the potential misidentification of infant functional networks when using adult models and explores the consequences and possible solutions to this problem. Our findings suggest that although adult networks only marginally describe infant FC organization better than chance, misidentification is primarily driven by specific areas. Restricting functional networks to areas with adult-like network clustering revealed consistent within-network FC across scans and throughout development. These areas are also near locations with low network identity variability. Our results highlight the implications of using adult networks for infants and offer guidance for selecting and utilizing functional network models based on research questions and scenarios.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexChild DevelopmentNerve NetAdultBrain MappingChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysFMRIFunctional connectivityInfantNetworkResting stateSystem

Identifiers

PMID40112680
PMCPMC11978374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.