Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40112286›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic ("So Much Contradictory Evidence"): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums.

Shannon Lea Watkins, Katherine Snodgrass, Lexi Fahrion, Emily Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shannon Lea WatkinsDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-6654
Katherine SnodgrassCollege of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5275-7461
Lexi FahrionDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7599-3133
Emily ShawDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1870-8423

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jong Sung Kim · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how social media platforms facilitate information exchange and influence behavior during health crises can enhance public health responses during times of uncertainty. While some risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity (eg, old age) were clear, whether e-cigarette use increased risk was not clear. People who used e-cigarettes had to navigate both the COVID-19 infodemic and a conflicting, politicized, and changing information environment about the interaction between COVID-19 and e-cigarette use.

objectiveThis study aims to characterize and contextualize e-cigarette-related behavior changes during the early COVID-19 pandemic and illuminate the role that social media played in decision-making.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative analysis of COVID-19-related e-cigarette discussions on 3 Reddit forums about e-cigarettes. We collected 189 relevant discussion threads made in the first 6 months of the pandemic (collected from June 27, 2020, to July 3, 2020). Threads included 3155 total comments (mean 17 comments) from approximately 1200 unique Redditors. We developed and applied emergent codes related to e-cigarette perceptions and behaviors (eg, the role of nicotine in COVID-19 and do-it-yourself narratives) and web-based community interactions (eg, advice), identified thematic patterns across codes, and developed a model to synthesize the socioecological context of e-cigarette behaviors.

resultse-Cigarette subreddits provided a platform for Redditors to discuss perceptions and experiences with e-cigarettes, make sense of information, and provide emotional support. Discussions reflected an array of e-cigarette-related behavioral responses, including increases and decreases in use intensity, changes in purchasing practices (eg, stockpiling), and changes in vaping practices (eg, reusing disposable pods). This study presented a theoretically and empirically informed model of how circumstances created by the pandemic (eg, changes in activity space and product shortages) compelled behavior changes. Redditors drew from their existing perceptions, intentions, and experiences with nicotine and tobacco products; their personal pandemic experiences; and their participation on Reddit to decide whether and how to change their e-cigarette behaviors during the early pandemic. Forums reflected uncertainty, stress, and debate about the rapidly evolving and complicated public health information. Consumption and discussion of media (eg, news articles and peer-reviewed publications) on Reddit informed e-cigarette perceptions and behaviors. Decisions were complicated by distrust of the media.

conclusionsVariations in individual traits and environmental circumstances during the early COVID-19 pandemic provide context for why there was no unified direction of e-cigarette behavior change during this period. Information and discussion on Reddit also informed risk perceptions and decisions during the pandemic. Social media is an effective and important place to communicate public health information, particularly during crisis or disaster situations. Moving forward, transparent, accurate, and specific message development should consider the stress, struggles, and stigma of people who use e-cigarettes and address the roles mistrust and misinformation play in decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaVapingDocument AnalysisHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2health communicationnew medianicotinesocial mediatobaccovaping

Identifiers

PMID40112286
PMCPMC11969130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.