ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Unknotting RNA: A method to resolve computational artifacts.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA 3D structure prediction often encounters entanglements, computational artifacts that complicate structural models, resulting in their exclusion from further studies despite the potentially accurate prediction of regions outside the entanglement. This study presents a protocol aimed at resolving such issues in RNA models while preserving the overall 3D fold and structural integrity. By employing the SPQR coarse-grained model and short Molecular Dynamics simulations, the protocol imposes energy terms that enable selective modifications to disentangle structures without causing significant distortions. The method was validated on 195 entangled RNA models from CASP15 and RNA-Puzzles, successfully resolving over 70% of interlaces and approximately 40% of lassos, with minimal impact on the original geometry but notable improvement in ClashScore. The efficiency of untangling conformations that are unequivocally classified as artifacts is 81%. Certain cases, particularly those involving dense packing of atoms or complex secondary structures, posed challenges that limited the efficiency of the method. In this paper, we present quantitative results from the application of the protocol and discuss examples of both successfully disentangled and unresolved structures. We show a viable approach for refining models previously deemed unsuitable due to topological artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.