ArticlePloS one2025
Urban-rural differences in the successful aging among older adults in China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of Life as a Predictor of Successful Aging in Urban and Rural Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Croatia-Slavonia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Urban riverbank green spaces as therapeutic environments: Examining the psychosocial benefits of square dance in aging populations in China.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Protective Factors for Falls Among Independent Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to reveal urban-rural disparities in successful aging among Chinese older adults and the impact of gender and age on aging outcomes. We utilized the Successful Aging Index (SAI), a multidimensional measure encompassing social, economic, bio-clinical, psychological, and lifestyle factors. Scores on the SAI range from 0 to 10, with higher scores signifying better aging. Data was sourced from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, comprising 7,315 participants. Urban older adults (OU) had significantly higher SAI scores than rural older adults (OR), with averages of 4.32 ± 1.44 and 3.85 ± 1.24, respectively (p < 0.001). Men showed more successful aging than women, regardless of their residence (p < 0.001). OU had better financial and educational status and higher social activity scores, except for friend interaction (p < 0.001). They were more physically active (p < 0.001), more adherent to the Mediterranean diet (p < 0.001), and less likely to smoke (p = 0.018). However, OU had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors compared to OR (p < 0.001). Notably, depression scores were similar between OU and OR (p = 0.129). In summary, significant urban-rural differences in successful aging are evident among Chinese older adults, with urban-dwelling older adults aging more successfully than their rural peers. Men, irrespective of their place of residence, experience more successful aging outcomes than women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.