ArticlePloS one2025
Using a Bayesian network to classify time to return to sport based on football injury epidemiological data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When evidence fails in real life: Rethinking sports injury rehabilitation and prevention.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2026Review
- Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stronger hearts, weaker leaps? The cardiac power paradox in elite soccer.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The return-to-sport (RTS) process is multifaceted and complex, as multiple variables may interact and influence the time to RTS. These variables include intrinsic factors related the player, such as anthropometrics and playing position, or extrinsic factors, such as competitive pressure. Providing an individualised estimation of time to return to play is often challenging, and clinical decision support tools are not common in sports medicine. This study uses epidemiological data to demonstrate a Bayesian Network (BN). We applied a BN that integrated clinical, non-clinical factors, and expert knowledge to classify time day to RTS and injury severity (minimal, mild, moderate and severe) for individual players. Retrospective injury data of 3374 player seasons and 6143 time-loss injuries from seven seasons of the professional German football league (Bundesliga, 2014/2015 through 2020/2021) were collected from public databases and media resources. A total of twelve variables from three categories (player's characteristics and anthropometrics, match information and injury information) were included. The response variables were 1) days to RTS (1-3, 4-7, 8-14, 15-28, 29-60, > 60, and 2) injury severity (minimal, mild, moderate, and severe). The sensitivity of the model for days to RTS was 0.24-0.97, while for severity categories it was 0.73-1.00. The user's accuracy of the model for days to RTS was 0.52-0.83, while for severity categories, it was 0.67-1.00. The BN can help to integrate different data types to model the probability of an outcome, such as days to return to sport. In our study, the BN may support coaches and players in 1) predicting days to RTS given an injury, 2) team planning via assessment of scenarios based on players' characteristics and injury risk, and 3) understanding the relationships between injury risk factors and RTS. This study demonstrates the how a Bayesian network may aid clinical decision making for RTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.