Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40112131›Full record

SynthesisInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.

Iulia Andras, Federico Piramide, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Fabrizio Di Maida, Filippo Turri, Edward Lambert, Mike Wenzel, Danny Darlington, Marco Paciotti, Giuseppe Basile and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with and without Mixed Reality - REALITATEM study.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Iulia AndrasDepartment of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Federico PiramideSchool of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Carlo Andrea BraviDepartment of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fabrizio Di MaidaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Filippo TurriDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Edward LambertDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
Mike WenzelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Danny DarlingtonDepartment of Urology, Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK.
Marco PaciottiDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
Giuseppe BasileDepartment of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 08025 Milan, Italy.
Christoph WurnschimmelDepartment of Urology, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Nikolaos LiakosDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty and Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Gabriele SorceDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
Ruben De GrooteDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Kissimmee, FL, USA.
Paolo Dell'OglioDepartment of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Nicolae CrisanDepartment of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandre MottrieDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
Alessandro LarcherDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe adoption of novel multi-port, single-port and modular robotic platforms has significantly increased in the last years. We aim to provide an overview of the preliminary clinical outcomes of the procedures performed with these new robotic systems, assessing their particular features and safety profile during the learning curve Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed on 15th May 2023 on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, to identify original articles presenting clinical outcomes of new robotic systems for abdominal urologic surgery. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42023437863).

resultsSix new robotic platforms were identified. Of 2925 papers identified, 71 met our inclusion criteria: 49 on single-port system and 22 on novel multi-port systems. We found variable outcomes for the most common procedures performed with these new systems. However, all of them showed acceptable perioperative and oncologic outcomes during the learning curve and good safety profile. Functional outcomes were underreported Conclusions: The adoption of novel multi-port and single-port robotic systems in urologic surgery can offer new opportunities for enhanced precision, reduced invasiveness, and potentially improved patient outcomes. The variability in outcomes across different platforms underscores the need for continued research and standardized training.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLearning CurveTreatment OutcomeGeneral SurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40112131
PMCPMC12236976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.