ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Impact of Diagnosis of Urologic Cancer on Male Sexuality and Patients' Perceptions of Health Professional's Approach.
Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative mental health needs in urological and genitourinary surgery: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Impact of Partial Penectomy and Glansectomy on Couples' Sexual Function.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a urological neoplasm diagnosis on male sexuality and examine patient perceptions of healthcare professionals' engagement with sexuality at diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included adult men diagnosed with urological neoplasms across two urology cancer centers from October 2022 to April 2024. Exclusions applied to those with prior cancer treatment, inactive sexual lives, or histories of anxiety/depression treatment. Data were retrospectively gathered from medical records and individual interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire on male sexuality, relationship dynamics, and perceptions of physicians' approach to sexuality. Analysis was conducted in RStudio using chi-square tests.
resultsA cohort of 211 patients were included in this study, with an age range of 22 to 85 years (mean = 65.4). Among these patients, the diagnoses of urogenital cancer included cases of prostate (79.1%), bladder (9.9%), kidney (4.2%), testicular (3.7%), and penile (2.8%) neoplasms. Sexual activity was considered important by 90.5%, with 75.8% reporting decreased frequency post-diagnosis (99.5% were heterosexual and 72.5% were married). Anxiety or depression was reported by 46.9%, while 72% developed specific fears, primarily concerning erectile function and partner satisfaction. Only 23.2% of physicians addressed sexuality at diagnosis, with patient satisfaction significantly higher when these discussions occurred. Satisfaction levels were notably correlated with tumor site, with bladder cancer patients reporting higher satisfaction compared to those with prostate or penile cancer.
conclusionsSexual issues extend beyond genital urological cancers, affecting patients with kidney and bladder cancers, with impacts often beginning at diagnosis. Early discussions on sexual health, combined with empathetic support, sexual education, and multidisciplinary care, are essential for the well-being of patients and their partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.