ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Implementing the Chinese mandatory antimicrobial stewardship program: barriers to continuous improvement.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Resistance and the Return to a Pre-Antibiotic Era: A Critical Narrative Review of a Global Catastrophe.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Psychosocial determinants of antibiotic stewardship decisions among Chinese clinicians across hospital tiers: a longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multilevel barriers to antimicrobial stewardship in tertiary care hospitals: A comparative systematic scoping review of high-income versus low-/middle-income countries evidence mapped by study design and healthcare professionals.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a qualitative study based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Selective strategic adaptation and structural trade-offs in a public traditional Chinese medicine hospital under China's national performance appraisal: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- The clinical value of PDCA cycle led by clinical pharmacists in optimizing the use of antimicrobial drugs in pediatric departments of primary hospitals.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular epidemiology and environmental persistence of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positiveVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Focusing on the III Strategic Priority of National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance Through the Baseline Assessment of Indicators of Infection Prevention and Control in a Provincial Hospital in Nepal: A Quality Improvement Project.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the implementation strategy, unintended consequences, and underlying barriers to mandatory antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in China. Face-to-face, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted in 16 public hospitals in eastern, central, and western China. Hospitals were purposely selected with full consideration to represent both economically developing and developed areas and both secondary and tertiary care hospitals. A total of 111 respondents were interviewed, including 38 doctors, 28 clinical pharmacists, 15 microbiologists, 14 infection prevention and control specialists, 10 experts from medical service departments, and 6 quality improvement experts. A thematic framework analysis was conducted. A common implementation strategy was found among the surveyed hospitals in response to the AMS programs mandated by healthcare authorities. The hospital leadership empowered an AMS team to set AMS-related indicators for each clinical department and each doctor, and adopted core elements of AMS to optimize antimicrobial prescribing. However, the mandatory AMS approach also caused unintended consequences including regulatory circumvention, shift of risk to doctors and patients, and demotivation of healthcare workers. Two key barriers to AMS implementation were identified: (i) poor communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, characterized by a high-power-low-power dynamic within hospital disciplines; and (ii) the profit-driven compensation system, which discourages collaboration and resource distribution for AMS implementation. Mandatory AMS programs should intensify AMS training, promote communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, adjust the compensation system to facilitate better AMS implementation, and offer supportive measures that enable the adoption of strict regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.