ArticlePloS one2025
Voxel-based versus network-analysis of changes in brain states in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations using the Eriksen Flanker task.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated neural correlates of switching between task-processing and periods of rest in a conventional ON-OFF block-design in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) and healthy controls. It has been proposed that auditory hallucinations are a failure of top-down control of bottom-up perceptual processes which could be due to aberrant up- and down regulation of brain networks. A version of the Eriksen Flanker task was used to assess cognitive flexibility and conflict control. BOLD fMRI with alternating blocks of task engagement and rest was collected using a 3T MR scanner. The objective of the study was to explore how patients would dynamically modulate relevant brain networks in response to shifting environmental demands, while transitioning from a resting state to active task-processing. Analysis of performance data found significant behavioral effects between the groups, where AVH patients performed the Flanker task significantly less accurately and with longer reaction times (RTs) than the healthy control group, indicating that AVH patients displayed reduced top-down guided conflict control. A network connectivity analysis of the fMRI data showed that both groups recruited similar networks related to task-present and task-absent conditions. However, the controls displayed increased network variability across task-present and task-absent conditions. This would indicate that the controls were better at switching between networks and conditions when demands changed from task-present to task-absent, with the consequence that they would perform the Flanker task better than the AVH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.