Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111994›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Evaluating fairness of machine learning prediction of prolonged wait times in Emergency Department with Interpretable eXtreme gradient boosting.

Hao Wang, Nethra Sambamoorthi, Nathan Hoot, David Bryant, Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-0951
Nethra SambamoorthiSenior biostatistician, CRM Portals LLC, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Nathan HootDepartment of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
David BryantDepartment of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Usha SambamoorthiCollege of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
Texas Minority Health, Research and Outreach (MiHERO)S21MD012472 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI JAMBOOR K. VISHWANATHA · 2017 to 2026
$18.0M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032581NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD012472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential to evaluate performance and assess quality before applying artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models to clinical practice. This study utilized ML to predict patient wait times in the Emergency Department (ED), determine model performance accuracies, and conduct fairness evaluations to further assess ethnic disparities in using ML for wait time prediction among different patient populations in the ED. This retrospective observational study included adult patients (age ≥18 years) in the ED (n=173,856 visits) who were assigned an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level of 3 at triage. Prolonged wait time was defined as waiting time ≥30 minutes. We employed extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for predicting prolonged wait times. Model performance was assessed with accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and false negative rate (FNR). To perform the global and local interpretation of feature importance, we utilized Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to interpret the output from the XGBoost model. Fairness in ML models were evaluated across sensitive attributes (sex, race and ethnicity, and insurance status) at both subgroup and individual levels. We found that nearly half (48.43%, 84,195) of ED patient visits demonstrated prolonged ED wait times. XGBoost model exhibited moderate accuracy performance (AUROC=0.81). When fairness was evaluated with FNRs, unfairness existed across different sensitive attributes (male vs. female, Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic White, and patients with insurances vs. without insurance). The predicted FNRs were lower among females, Hispanics, and patients without insurance compared to their counterparts. Therefore, XGBoost model demonstrated acceptable performance in predicting prolonged wait times in ED visits. However, disparities arise in predicting patients with different sex, race and ethnicity, and insurance status. To enhance the utility of ML model predictions in clinical practice, conducting performance assessments and fairness evaluations are crucial.

Identifiers

PMID40111994
PMCPMC11925291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.