ArticlePloS one2025
User perceptions of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary Australian hospital.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical antimicrobial prophylaxis remains the most common indication for antimicrobial use in Australian hospitals. Despite efforts to improve practice, adherence to guideline recommendations continues to be suboptimal across surgical disciplines, including orthopaedics. The Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 currently advocates for single dose prophylaxis for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. Audits undertaken in one Australian tertiary hospital have identified low levels of adherence to this recommendation. It is unclear as to why guidelines are not adhered to in this setting.
aimTo understand the factors that influence multidose prescribing for ORIF procedures and the barriers and enablers to guideline use in an Australian tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsInterviews (focus groups and one-on-one sessions) were held with orthopaedic surgeons (consultants), orthopaedic registrars, pharmacists, and anaesthetists from a tertiary public hospital in Australia. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to analyse results.
resultsSix focus groups and three one-on-one interviews were conducted. Data were mapped to 12 TDF domains. Although clinicians were aware of guideline recommendations, this alone did not encourage the use of single dose prophylaxis. The decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics was influenced by a combination of patient and environmental factors as well as fear of infection development. The lack of guideline specificity was commonly highlighted as a barrier to guideline use, as well as lack of agreement with guideline content. Enablers to guideline use included education that was targeted and repetitive, as well as improved dissemination of guidelines.
conclusionThere are myriad factors that influence the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotics for ORIF procedures. By understanding the social and cultural context of a local setting and the barriers and enablers that pertain to an environment, interventions can be developed to enhance guideline use, thereby improving antimicrobial prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.