ArticlePloS one2025
Extreme heat prediction through deep learning and explainable AI.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Heat-Related Illness Prediction: An XGBoost-SHAP Approach Using Korean Meteorological Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme heat waves are causing widespread concern for comprehensive studies on their ecological and societal implications. With the ongoing rise in global temperatures, precise forecasting of heatwaves becomes increasingly crucial for proactive planning and ensuring safety. This study investigates the efficacy of deep learning (DL) models, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Conolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), using five years of meteorological data from Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD), by integrating Explainable AI (XAI) techniques to enhance the interpretability of models. Although Weather forecasting has advanced in predicting sunshine, rain, clouds, and general weather patterns, the study of extreme heat, particularly using advanced computer models, remains largely unexplored, overlooking this gap risks significant disruptions in daily life. Our study addresses this gap by collecting five years of weather dataset and developing a comprehensive framework integrating DL and XAI models for extreme heat prediction. Key variables such as temperature, pressure, humidity, wind, and precipitation are examined. Our findings demonstrate that the LSTM model outperforms others with a lead time of 1-3 days and minimal error metrics, achieving an accuracy of 96.2%. Through the utilization of SHAP and LIME XAI methods, we elucidate the significance of humidity and maximum temperature in accurately predicting extreme heat events. Overall, this study emphasizes how important it is to investigate intricate DL models that integrate XAI for the prediction of extreme heat. Making these models understood allows us to identify important parameters, improving heatwave forecasting accuracy and guiding risk-reduction strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.