Trial reportPsychological services2026
Examining why therapists add sessions to the written exposure therapy protocol and whether it improves treatment outcome: A mixed-methods analysis.
Trial report in Psychological services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Written exposure therapy (WET) is a brief psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although WET is designed to be delivered in five sessions, implementation data collected from trained mental health care providers suggest that therapists sometimes add more sessions without sufficient justification. We conducted a mixed-methods examination to understand why therapists added WET sessions and whether adding sessions improved treatment outcomes. Participants were drawn from a larger trial where therapists were permitted to deliver five to seven WET sessions. This study included 77 client participants who were randomly assigned to receive WET and nine therapist participants who delivered WET during the trial. Results showed that PTSD symptom severity trajectories at follow-up assessment were not significantly different between client participants who received five sessions and those who received more than five. Only 15.7% of participants who received supplemental WET sessions displayed a clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptom severity, while 11.8% displayed a clinically meaningful increase in PTSD symptom severity. Qualitative interviews with therapists indicated that their decision to add sessions was largely driven by the client avoiding writing about the traumatic event in early treatment sessions or due to a very complex or lengthy traumatic event that required additional sessions to provide repeated exposure to the trauma memory. Taken together, the findings suggest that adding WET sessions is unnecessary most of the time, but therapists have a strong preference for having flexibility in adding treatment sessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.