Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111817›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025

How to add baskets to an ongoing basket trial with information borrowing.

Libby Daniells, Pavel Mozgunov, Helen Barnett, Alun Bedding, Thomas Jaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Libby DaniellsSTOR-i Centre for Doctoral Training, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-5965
Pavel MozgunovMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-0284
Helen BarnettSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Alun BeddingRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Thomas JakiMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basket trials test a single therapeutic treatment on several patient populations under one master protocol. A desirable adaptive design feature is the ability to incorporate new baskets to an ongoing trial. Limited basket sample sizes can result in reduced power and precision of treatment effect estimates, which could be amplified in added baskets due to the shorter recruitment time. While various Bayesian information borrowing techniques have been introduced to tackle the issue of small sample sizes, the impact of including new baskets into the borrowing model has yet to be investigated. We explore approaches for adding baskets to an ongoing trial under information borrowing. Basket trials have pre-defined efficacy criteria to determine whether the treatment is effective for patients in each basket. The efficacy criteria are often calibrated a-priori in order to control the basket-wise type I error rate to a nominal level. Traditionally, this is done under a null scenario in which the treatment is ineffective in all baskets, however, we show that calibrating under this scenario alone will not guarantee error control under alternative scenarios. We propose a novel calibration approach that is more robust to false decision making. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the performance of the approaches for adding a basket, which is monitored through type I error rate control and power. The results display a substantial improvement in power for a new basket, however, this comes with potential inflation of error rates. We show that this can be reduced under the proposed calibration procedure.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalSample Sizeadaptive designBasket trialBayesian modellingcalibrationerror controlinformation borrowing

Identifiers

PMID40111817
PMCPMC12075893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.