ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025
On estimation of overall treatment effects in multiregional clinical trials under a discrete random effects model.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) have become a standard strategy for pharmaceutical product development worldwide. The heterogeneity of regional treatment effects is anticipated in an MRCT. For a two-group comparative study in an MRCT, patient assignments, including regional weights and treatment allocation ratios, are predetermined under the same protocol. In practice, the observed patient assignments at the final analysis stage are often not equal to the predetermined patient assignments, which may impact the accuracy of estimating the overall treatment effect and may lead to a biased estimator. In this study, we use a discrete random effects model (DREM) to account for the heterogeneous treatment effect across regions in an MRCT and propose a bias-adjusted estimator of the overall treatment effect through a naïve estimator conditioned on ancillary statistics based on the observed patient assignments at the final analysis stage in the trial. We also perform power analysis for the overall treatment effect and determine the overall sample size for the bias-adjusted estimator with the DREM. Results of simulation studies are given to illustrate applications of the proposed approach. Finally, we provide an example to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.