ArticleGenes & genomics2025
Backtracking identification techniques for predicting unclear bacterial taxonomy at species level: molecular diagnosis-based bacterial classification.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Point of care antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Variation in Intramuscular Fat Deposition of Goats and Sheep and Its Correlation with Gut Microbiota.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial 16S rRNA genes are widely used to classify bacterial communities within interesting environments (e.g., plants, water, human body) because they contain nine hyper-variable regions (V1-V9) reflecting a large number of sequence variation sites between species. Short-read sequencing platform (targeting partial region of 16S rRNA gene; approximately 150-500 bp) commonly used in the 16S-based microbiome study is favored by many researchers because it is economical and can generate highthroughput sequencing data faster than long-read sequencing platforms. However, this sequencing platform has technical limitations in that it cannot clarify bacterial classification at the species level compared to long-read sequencing technology, which can cover the unclassification issue due to sequence similarity between species by targeting the 16S full-length region. In recent microbiome research-related industries, species-level high-resolution microbial classification is considered a key challenge to secure microbial resources among institutions in the field. However, the long-read sequencing platforms currently offered are still under price adjustment (demanding higher cost than short-read sequencing platforms) and have the disadvantage of low base-calling accuracy compared to short-read sequencing platforms. Therefore, this brief communication introduces the'Molecular diagnosis-based bacterial classification' technology to predict candidate species by backtracking for unclassified bacterial taxonomy at the species level in the NGS-based 16S microbiome study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40111647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.