Observational studyInternational journal of hematology2025
Real-world effectiveness of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Asians with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Observational study in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ixazomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone (ICd), With or Without Daratumumab in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2026Trial
- Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Hungarian Real-World Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials have shown ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) to be efficacious and safe in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); however, real-world data are limited. The APEX study was a multicenter, observational cohort study of IRd conducted at 16 sites across South Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand. Overall, 104 patients treated with IRd during 2016-2023 were enrolled; data were collected by retrospective chart review and 6-month prospective follow-up. Median age at IRd initiation was 64.0 years. The primary endpoints of median time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall response rate (ORR) were 32.1 months and 72.1%, respectively (though ORR varied across countries). The secondary endpoint of median progression-free survival was 27.7 months, while median overall survival was not reached. Median TTNT and ORR were higher in elderly patients (≥65 and/or ≥70 years) than in the overall population. Adverse events occurred in 90.4% and serious adverse events occurred in 29.8% of all patients; common Grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reactions were pneumonia (9.6%), neutropenia (7.7%), and gastroenteritis (2.9%). This study demonstrated that IRd was safe and effective in real-world practice in Asia, including for elderly patients, and the results are aligned with TOURMALINE-MM1 and other real-world studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.