ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
Transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation with α-hexyl cyanoacrylate MagicGlue®: short-term safety and efficacy outcomes.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid embolic agents-a practical overview.CVIR endovascular · 2026Review
- Association between embolic agent choice and complications after transcatheter arterial embolization for colonic diverticular bleeding.European radiology · 2026Article
- The "no microcatheter use" technique for varicocele embolization with cyanoacrylate glue: is it really more cost-effective?International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Prophylactic transarterial embolization after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding - is it time to act?Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Prostatic Artery Embolization with Cyanoacrylate Glue for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Single-arm Meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2026Review
- Invited Commentary on the Embolic Effect of Different Cyanoacrylates: Radiological and Histological Comparison in an in vivo Rabbit Renal-Artery Model.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur purpose was to assess the feasibility and the short-term safety and efficacy outcomes of a wide range of transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation procedures done using α-hexyl-cyanoacrylate (AHCA)-MagicGlue® in patients with bleeding and non-bleeding disorders.
methodsThis single-centre retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent emergent or planned AHCA-MagicGlue® transcatheter embolisation between February 2019 and September 2023. Technical success, clinical success, 30-day mortality, and complication rates were evaluated.
resultsWe included 101 patients with a mean age of 49.9 ± 20.5 years who underwent arterial (n = 43, 42.6%) or venous (n = 58, 57.4%) embolisation for bleeding (n = 16, 15.8%) or other reasons (n = 85, 84.2%). The technical success rate was 100%. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 months, the clinical success rate was 94% in patients with bleeding and 95% in other patients; 1 patient died of multi-organ failure unrelated to the procedure. In the 22 patients with prostatic artery embolisation, statistically significant improvements were recorded at 3 months versus baseline for the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (10.0 ± 5.8 vs. 20.8 ± 7.3, p = 0.001), IPSS quality-of-life score (2.0 ± 1.4 vs. 5.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.001), and prostate volume (67.8 ± 38.0 mL vs. 96.7 ± 47.4 mL, p = 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 11 (10.9%) patients and were major in 4 and minor in 7 patients.
conclusionsMagicGlue® transcatheter arterial and venous embolisation is feasible, effective, and safe for bleeding and non-bleeding conditions across a broad range of anatomic sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.