Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111533›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025

Prioritization of prognostic biomarkers regulated by calorie restriction in colon cancer through integrated biosignature analysis.

Oladayo E Apalowo, Joel J Komakech, Isaac D Boateng, Esther E Nwanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oladayo E ApalowoDepartment of Biochemistry, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA. oea24@msstate.edu.
Joel J KomakechDepartment of Biochemistry, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Isaac D BoatengCertified Group, 199 W Rhapsody Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78216, USA.
Esther E NwannaSchool of Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California Davis, Tulare, CA, 93274, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a critical global health challenge, ranking second in cancer-related mortality and third in cancer incidence as of 2018, with risk increasing with age. Addressing its rising burden requires early diagnosis, prognostic biomarkers, and effective therapeutic strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that calorie restriction may mitigate aging-related functional decline and influence CRC progression, yet the molecular markers and mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed the GSE24432 dataset, using multiple computational databases to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with calorie restriction in CRC. Functional annotations, including Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG pathway analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), were undertaken to explore potential underlying mechanisms and pathways in CRC pathogenesis. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to establish the diagnostic and prognostic significance of the hub genes. The validation test was conducted via multiple databases. Our investigation identified 50 DEGs, using the cutoff criteria, p. adj < 0.05, |log2FC|> 0.3. GO and functional analysis results revealed extensive crosstalk of cellular and molecular components and pathways associated with mRNA and ribosome biogenesis, AMPK signaling, and p53 signaling pathway following calorie restriction. To understand how these DEGs drive biological reactions, we sorted the genes according to gene score > 3 and GO term > 3 and obtained 14 DEGs most relevant to the GO terms. Further analysis with GO CHORD showed that most genes are enriched in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed the involvement of the hub genes in several hallmarks, such as tissue invasion and metastasis (p < 0.001), tumor-promoting inflammation (p < 0.001), resisting cell death (p < 0.01), and replicative immortality (p < 0.05). Survival analysis showed that higher expression of 7 hub genes, CDKN2A (p < 0.05), RPL9 (p < 0.02), TUBB6 (p < 0.01), and RPS15A (p < 0.01), and lower expression of CDKN1B (p < 0.01), NPM1 (p < 0.01), and RALA (p < 0.01), correlated to shorter survival of colon cancer. However, cross-reference of these genes revealed that calorie restriction decreased the expressions of CDKN2A and TUBB6 while CDKN1B and NPM1 were increased (p < 0.05). Several validation tests from multiple databases showed that high CDKN2A is associated with shorter overall survival rates, indicating CDKN2A is a therapeutic target and could serve as a more reliable biomarker for CRC prognosis. These findings could potentially facilitate the development of precision-based energy restriction interventions for CRC management, offering promising prospects for targeted therapeutic strategies for CRC patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCaloric RestrictionColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OntologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCalorie restrictionCDKN2AColorectal cancerObesityPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40111533
PMCPMC11926006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.