ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Evaluation of the implementation of the minimally invasive emergency procedure REBOA via an open surgical approach in a teaching unit - a cadaveric study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an increasingly used trauma resuscitation procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the open surgical technique in a cardiac arrest model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-one fresh cadavers were included in the study. 46 times the open arterial cutdown for the emergency procedure REBOA were performed and evaluated by physicians from a level I. trauma center.
resultsFor open arterial cutdown time from skin incision to blocking the balloon in averaged 340.6 s (SD: 136.6; range: 178-600) and the balloon was correctly positioned and blocked 37 times (80.4%; 37/46) and failed 9 times (19.6%; 9/46).
conclusionsThis study vividly demonstrates that in patients in severe shock or cardiac arrest condition, the open surgical puncture for the implications of the REBOA catheter is a good and safe alternative to the percutaneous ultrasound-targeted technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, Cadaveric Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40111468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.