Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111393›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Genetic diversity affects ecosystem functions across trophic levels as much as species diversity, but in an opposite direction.

Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy, Maxim Lefort, Jerome G Prunier, Madoka Krick, Rik Verdonck, Charlotte Veyssiere, Murielle Richard, Delphine Legrand, Geraldine Loot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura FargeotCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Camille PoesyCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Maxim LefortCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Jerome G PrunierCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Madoka KrickCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Rik VerdonckCenter for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Charlotte VeyssiereUniversité Paul Sabatier (UPS) Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Murielle RichardCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Delphine LegrandCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.
Geraldine LootUniversité Paul Sabatier (UPS) Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Blanchet SimonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, Moulis, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-589X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-0041Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-18-CE02-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels - primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers - in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity - gauged within three pivotal species - within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemFood ChainGenetic VariationAnimalsAlnuscrustaceansecologyfishGammarusPhoxinusriparian trees

Identifiers

PMID40111393
PMCPMC11925449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.