ArticleJAMA network open2025
Practice Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Immunotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the image: achieving complete pathologic response in MSI-high metastatic colon cancer despite persistent PET activity.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Genomic Landscape of Korean Gastric Cancer: Integrating Biomarker Associations and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Gastric Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Global research trends on the gut microbiota and immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Harnessing immunotherapy in sporadic MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer: a case study.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy versus chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for resected MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer: real-world evidence informing precision strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Optimizing early-phase immunotherapy trials: the role of biomarker enrichment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for treatment of microsatellite instable (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but factors associated with receipt and efficacy of ICIs in routine clinical practice remain largely unknown. Objective: To identify factors associated with receipt of ICIs and associated survival outcomes among patients with mCRC in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used deidentified data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived database to include 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC between January 2013 and June 2019. Population-based patients were diagnosed with de novo mCRC and had at least 2 documented clinical visits on or after the date of diagnosis. The study analyses were performed between September 2020 and April 2021. Exposure: Patients received ICI therapy and/or chemotherapy as part of a systemic treatment for mCRC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes were receipt of ICI therapy, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Results: In this cohort study of 18 932 patients diagnosed with mCRC (10 537 [55.7%] male; 546 [2.9%] Asian, 2005 [10.6%] Black or African American, 1674 [8.8%] Hispanic, 12 338 [65.2%] White, 4043 [21.4%] unknown race or ethnicity; median [IQR] age at metastatic diagnosis, 64.6 [55.0-73.3] years), patients with MSI-H tumors had a significantly higher probability of receiving ICIs than those with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors (odds ratio [OR], 22.66 [95% CI, 17.30-29.73]; P < .001), whereas patients initially diagnosed with synchronous mCRC had significantly lower odds of receiving ICIs than patients with metachronous mCRC (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.73]; P < .001). Patients with MSI-H tumors who received ICIs as first line of therapy had significantly longer OS than those receiving chemotherapy only (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25-0.56]; P < .001). Among patients with MSS tumors, ICI-based therapy was associated with significantly longer OS for patients with high albumin level (vs low: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.18-0.45]; P < .001) and antibiotic use (vs nonuse: HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]; P < .001), but a significantly shorter OS for patients with synchronous mCRC (vs metachronous: HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.24-2.89]; P = .003). In addition, 29 out of 235 patients with MSS tumors (12.3%) experienced durable responses on ICI-based therapy. Similar patterns of associations with TTD were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with mCRC, clinical characteristics were associated with different survival outcomes in patients treated with ICI-based therapy, with important clinical implications for patients with MSS tumors who are generally unresponsive to immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.