Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111367›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Treatment and Attrition Trends for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.

Zeynep Irem Ozay, Yeonjung Jo, Gliceida Galarza Fortuna, Chadi Hage Chehade, Georges Gebrael, Micah Ostrowski, Nicolas Sayegh, Ethan Anderson, Salvador Jaime-Casas, Miguel Zugman and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. LowerCancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zeynep Irem OzayDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Yeonjung JoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Gliceida Galarza FortunaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Chadi Hage ChehadeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Georges GebraelDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Micah OstrowskiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Nicolas SayeghDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Ethan AndersonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Salvador Jaime-CasasDivision of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Miguel ZugmanDivision of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Vinay Mathew ThomasDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Benjamin L MaughanDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Neeraj AgarwalDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Sumanta K PalDivision of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Umang SwamiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The treatment landscape of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has rapidly evolved with the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. However, clinical data on changes in treatment patterns and attrition before and after ICI-based combinations approval are lacking. Objective: To assess treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with metastatic ccRCC before and after the approval of ICI-based combinations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used patient-level data from a nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database, originating from around 280 cancer clinics in the US. Patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC who received first-line therapy between January 1, 2011, and January 20, 2023, were included. Those treated for 2 or more malignant neoplasms or enrolled in clinical trials were excluded. Exposures: Line of therapy initiation before and after April 16, 2018. Main Outcomes Measures: Treatments received in each line of therapy and attrition rate were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Results: Of 12 707 patients with metastatic ccRCC within the database, 8534 were eligible and included (median [IQR] age, 66 [59-74] years; 6032 male [70.7%]; 629 Black [8.1%], 697 Hispanic [9.0%], 5493 White [71.0%]). Before April 16, 2018, the most common first-line therapy was tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy (3595 of 4561 patients [78.8%]). Following the approval of ICI-based combinations in 2018, most patients (2392 of 3973 patients [60.2%]) received ICI-based combinations as first-line therapy for metastatic ccRCC. TKI monotherapy remained the most common second- and third-line therapy in patients treated before and after April 16, 2018. Before 2018, 2639 patients (57.9%) and 1458 patients (31.9%) received second-line and third-line therapies, respectively, compared with 1494 (37.6%) and 562 (14.1%) after 2018. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 8534 patients with metastatic ccRCC, although ICI-based combinations are the preferred first-line therapy due to their proven superiority over TKI monotherapy, many patients were not receiving them; high attrition rates were observed in subsequent lines. These findings highlight the need to optimize treatment selection by implementing current guidelines in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40111367
PMCPMC11926653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.