ArticleJAMA network open2025
Treatment and Attrition Trends for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Subsequent systemic therapy initiation after first-line discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: insights from a Japanese real-world cohort.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular Evaluation of RNA-Based Immune Checkpoint Profiling in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Post-operative survival and use of systemic therapy in metastatic long-bone disease: 12 years of institutional experience.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics integration constructs a senescence-based prognostic model and identifies EIF4EBP1 as a therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Association of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid with underlying cancer type: A lack of association with cancer tissueJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- Targeting urological cancers with CAR-T cell therapy: current landscape and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world Effectiveness of Single-Agent Tivozanib in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2026Article
- Article
- Discovery of tumor antigens in renal cell carcinoma and prospects for clinical application.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of metabolic patterns in renal cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- LowerCancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
- Benmelstobart Plus Anlotinib Is Unlikely to Be Cost-Effective for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Integrated Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The treatment landscape of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has rapidly evolved with the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. However, clinical data on changes in treatment patterns and attrition before and after ICI-based combinations approval are lacking. Objective: To assess treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with metastatic ccRCC before and after the approval of ICI-based combinations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used patient-level data from a nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database, originating from around 280 cancer clinics in the US. Patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC who received first-line therapy between January 1, 2011, and January 20, 2023, were included. Those treated for 2 or more malignant neoplasms or enrolled in clinical trials were excluded. Exposures: Line of therapy initiation before and after April 16, 2018. Main Outcomes Measures: Treatments received in each line of therapy and attrition rate were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Results: Of 12 707 patients with metastatic ccRCC within the database, 8534 were eligible and included (median [IQR] age, 66 [59-74] years; 6032 male [70.7%]; 629 Black [8.1%], 697 Hispanic [9.0%], 5493 White [71.0%]). Before April 16, 2018, the most common first-line therapy was tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy (3595 of 4561 patients [78.8%]). Following the approval of ICI-based combinations in 2018, most patients (2392 of 3973 patients [60.2%]) received ICI-based combinations as first-line therapy for metastatic ccRCC. TKI monotherapy remained the most common second- and third-line therapy in patients treated before and after April 16, 2018. Before 2018, 2639 patients (57.9%) and 1458 patients (31.9%) received second-line and third-line therapies, respectively, compared with 1494 (37.6%) and 562 (14.1%) after 2018. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 8534 patients with metastatic ccRCC, although ICI-based combinations are the preferred first-line therapy due to their proven superiority over TKI monotherapy, many patients were not receiving them; high attrition rates were observed in subsequent lines. These findings highlight the need to optimize treatment selection by implementing current guidelines in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.