Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111098›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025

Using targeted genome methylation for crop improvement.

Zhibo Wang, Rebecca S Bart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  4. Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhibo WangDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.
Rebecca S BartDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1378-3481

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-002958National Science Foundation 2331437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing allows scientists to specifically change the DNA sequence of an organism. This powerful technology now fuels basic biology discovery and tangible crop improvement efforts. There is a less well understood layer of information encoded in genomes, known collectively as 'epigenetics', that impacts gene expression, without changing the DNA sequence. Epigenetic processes allow organisms to rapidly respond to environmental fluctuation. Like genome editing, recent advances have demonstrated that it is possible to edit the epigenome of a plant and cause heritable phenotypic changes. In this review, we aim to specifically consider the unique advantages that targeted epigenome editing might provide over existing biotechnology tools. This review is aimed at a broad audience. We begin with a high-level overview of the tools currently available for crop improvement. Next, we present a more detailed overview of the key discoveries that have been made in recent years, primarily using the model system Arabidopsis, new efforts to extend targeted methylation to crop plants, the current status of the technology, and the challenges that remain to realize the full potential of targeted epigenome editing. We end with a forward-looking commentary on how epi-alleles might interface with breeding programs across a variety of crops.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingGenome, PlantPlant BreedingEpigeneticsplant stresstargeted epigenome modification

Identifiers

PMID40111098
PMCPMC12190810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.