Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111067›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science2025

A concise review of millet milk development.

Nagarajan Meena, N U Sruthi, Pramesh Dhungana, Hayder Al-Ali, Pavuluri Srinivasa Rao, Rewati Raman Bhattarai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A concise review of millet milk development.Journal of food science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nagarajan MeenaAgricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6565-4561
N U SruthiSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Pramesh DhunganaSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Hayder Al-AliWide Open Agriculture, Leederville, Australia.
Pavuluri Srinivasa RaoAgricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
Rewati Raman BhattaraiSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-4423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing global shift from dairy milk to plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) due to environmental, ethical, and health concerns. PBMAs such as oat, soybean, and nut milk are commercially available, whereas millet milk is notable for being allergen-free. Millet is a nutrient-dense and cost-effective option, providing essential amino acids, minerals, and antioxidants. However, factors such as millet type, extraction methods, and processing techniques significantly impact the nutritional quality of the millet milk. A standardized processing pathway is essential to achieve an optimal nutritional profile, yet the lack of such a pathway remains a significant challenge in millet milk production. Therefore, this comprehensive review explores the impact of various preprocessing techniques and extraction methods for millet milk, as well as the application of novel stabilization techniques such as high- and ultrahigh-pressure homogenization, ultrasound, microfluidization, and pulsed electric fields on other PBMAs, proposing their potential for millet milk. Additionally, the existing millet milk processing techniques are compiled to a framework, and the nutritional composition of millet milk is compared to other PBMAs and cow milk. Lastly, the recommendations for future research, focusing on the development and nutritional optimization of millet milk, are presented.

Indexed as

Food HandlingMilkMilk SubstitutesMilletsAnimalsCattleHumansNutritive Valueextractionframeworkmillet milkpreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID40111067
PMCPMC11924886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.