ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
A Human-Centred Co-Design Framework for Developing a Web-Based Platform to Engage With Rural Australian Communities: Addressing the Complex Issue of Healthy Food Access.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacts of University Departments of Rural Health to Their Regions Through Intellectual Capital.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis report presents the co-design framework for developing, prototyping, testing and implementing a Web-based Platform (WBP) that will use participatory approaches to engage rural communities.The WBP will be used to understand the unique factors influencing access to healthy and unhealthy foods and to generate potential solutions for promoting healthier diets.
methodsA human-centred design (HSD) approach will be used to ideate, prototype, test and implement the WBP.
designParticipatory Action Research.
settingTwo rural local government areas in Australia.
participantsParticipants will include key stakeholders from each local government's relevant public health organisations, in addition to community members.
main outcome measuresReach (number, cohort representation and geographic spread) of active participants in the co-design process, community members that used the WBP tool and adoption (completion of WBP activities).
resultsA usable platform for communities to generate local solutions to drive change for diverse populations within rural communities in Australia. DISCUSSION: Significant advances and innovative approaches are needed to address the challenges of accessing healthy food in rural areas.
conclusionsThe resulting WBP has the potential to work at scale for communities in Australia and internationally in designing effective place-based solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.