Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110958›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

Association of allostatic load measured by allostatic load index on physical performance and psychological responses during arduous military training.

Evan D Feigel, Kristen J Koltun, Mita Lovalekar, Christopher K Kargl, Matthew B Bird, Jennifer N Forse, Varun J Patel, Brian J Martin, Elizabeth F Nagle, Karl E Friedl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Evan D FeigelNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3953-0764
Kristen J KoltunNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3234-3190
Mita LovalekarNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher K KarglNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-8274
Matthew B BirdNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer N ForseNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Varun J PatelNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brian J MartinNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elizabeth F NagleDepartment of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karl E FriedlUS Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, USA.
Bradley C NindlNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

DOD | USN | Office of Naval Research (ONR) ONR N00014-21-1-2725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Military personnel experience decrements in physical fitness and psychological well-being during training that may be attributed to allostatic load. This investigation examined the association between allostatic load measured by the allostatic load index (ALI) and physical performance and psychological responses in personnel undergoing a 10-week training course. Thirty-one participants (14 women) provided biochemical, questionnaire (perceived stress appraisal (PSS), sleep difficulty (SD), resilience (CD-RISC-25), and Physical Fitness Test (PFT; three-mile run [3MR], pullups, Run-Row PFT score, Push-Pull PFT score, Crunches-Plank PFT score, and total PFT score)) data before and after training. ALI (0-8) was calculated using biomarker components from neuroendocrine, autonomic, and immune systems. Simple linear regression analysis assessed the association between change (Δ) in ALI and responses. Backward stepwise regression identified components associated with responses (α = 0.05). In men, ΔALI was associated with Δpullups (β = -0.88, p = 0.015), Δpush-pull PFT score (β = -2.87, p = 0.013), Δtotal PFT score (β = -3.48, p = 0.007), and ΔSD (β = -0.56, p = 0.046) with immune components explaining relationships. In women, ΔALI was associated with ΔSD (β = -1.25, p < 0.001) and ΔCD-RISC-25 (β = 2.65, p = 0.025) with no component explaining relationships. Increased ALI is associated with worsened physical performance in men and improved psychological outcomes in women, highlighting potential sex-specific responses to increased allostatic load during training.

Indexed as

AllostasisMilitary PersonnelPhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical FitnessPhysical Functional PerformanceStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultadaptationAllostasisfitnessmaladaptationstress

Identifiers

PMID40110958
PMCPMC11923871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.