ArticleHealth services research2025
A Bootstrap Method to Estimate Cost of Behavioral Intervention Implementation: A Proof of Concept.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Bootstrap Method to Estimate Cost of Behavioral Intervention Implementation: A Proof of Concept.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a bootstrapping method to augment time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis intended to allow more realistic cost estimates. DATA SOURCES: Secondary data from a multisite clinical trial conducted from 2016 to 2018 on an ostomy self-management telehealth intervention for cancer survivors. STUDY
designThe intervention cost was newly estimated by incorporating expected patient participation rates calculated via bootstrapping. This cost was compared against the cost estimate obtained via traditional TDABC. DATA COLLECTION: Study personnel self-reported the time spent on each activity associated with the intervention. We also utilized patient participation data collected from the trial. PRINCIPAL
findingsThe total cost of the telehealth intervention estimated via the bootstrapping method was $210,052.62 (95% CI: 208,652.13, 211,402.51), with an average cost per participant of $1981.63 (95% CI: 1968.42, 1994.36). Traditional TDABC analysis yielded $186,363 or $1758 per participant. Further adjusting assumptions about the cost of the postintervention monitoring phase, our approach yielded an alternative estimate of $176,362.56 (95% CI: 174,962.07, 177,712.45) and an average cost per participant of $1663.80 (95% CI: 1650.59, 1676.53) suggesting both methods yielded similar bottom-line results.
conclusionsIncorporating bootstrapping into traditional TDABC methodology is feasible and is likely to capture variance in clinical trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.