Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110643›Full record

Trial reportJournal of genetic counseling2025

Toward a therapeutic relationship: A randomized control trial of the physical environment and client-centered communication in genetic counseling.

Elizabeth Broadbridge, Debra L Roter, Susan Persky, Lori H Erby

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth BroadbridgeDepartment of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-3697
Debra L RoterDepartment of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-9697
Susan PerskySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7768-5744
Lori H ErbyMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6200-9033

Funding

NHGRI NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic counselors routinely provide service in many environments, including counseling-type and medical-type rooms; in this study, counseling environments are characterized by office décor that facilitates discussion around a seated table, while medical environments include an exam table and separate seating. Outside of the genetic counseling context, manipulation of the environment can influence client comfort in disclosing personal information, well-being, and overall satisfaction with clinician communication. However, there is little known about how clients experience genetic counseling in one environment versus the other and how that might influence their evaluation of genetic counselor communication. To explore the extent to which the physical environment influences client perceptions, we video recorded two simulated sessions addressing the same genetic counseling topic with two contrasting styles of communication (more and less patient-centered) in front of a greenscreen background. Videos were digitally placed in counseling and medical environments such that the same verbal and nonverbal communication was presented in the two environments, creating a total of four videos (e.g., a 2 × 2 experimental design). Participants (N = 861) were randomly assigned to observe one of the four videos and respond as if they were the client in the video (e.g., as analog clients). Overall, participants rated the less patient-centered communication more favorably (p < 0.05 across variables), contrary to our expectations. Structural equation modeling revealed that perceptions of nonverbal communication mediated the relationship between communication style and perceptions of the counselor's encouragement of participation in the session and the therapeutic bond. Results offer insight into how the physical environment might influence communication in genetic counseling, illustrating new avenues for improving client-counselor communication in this context.

Indexed as

CommunicationGenetic CounselingProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered Carecommunicationgenetic counselinggenetic counselorsroter interaction analysis systemtherapeutic bondworking alliance

Identifiers

PMID40110643
PMCPMC11923929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.