Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110561›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Drug target assessments: classifying target modulation and associated health effects using multi-level BERT-based classification models.

Jennifer Venhorst, Gino Kalkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer VenhorstBiomedical and Digital Health, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht 3584 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-9776
Gino KalkmanBiomedical and Digital Health, The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht 3584 CB, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Drug target selection determines the success of the drug development pipeline. Therefore, novel drug targets need to be assessed for their therapeutic benefits/risks at the earliest stage possible. Where manual risk/benefit analyses are often user-biased and time-consuming, Large Language Models can offer a systematic and efficient approach to curating and analysing literature. Currently, publicly available Large Language Models are lacking for this task, while public platforms for target assessments are limited to co-occurrences. Results: BERT-models for multi-level classification of drug target-health effect relationships described in PubMed were developed. Relationships were classified based on (i) causality; (ii) direction of target modulation; (iii) direction of the associated health effect. The models showed competitive performances with F1 scores between 0.86 and 0.92 and their applicability was demonstrated using ADAM33 and OSM as case study. The developed classification pipeline is the first to allow detailed classification of drug target-health effect relationships. The models provide mechanistic insight into how target modulation affects health and disease, both from an efficacy and safety perspective. The models, deployed on the whole of PubMed and available through the TargetTri platform, are expected to offer a significant advancement in artificial intelligence-assisted target identification and evaluation. Availability and implementation: https://www.targettri.com.

Identifiers

PMID40110561
PMCPMC11919816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.