ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Quantifying uncertainty in microbiome-based prediction using Gaussian processes with microbial community dissimilarities.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Summary: The human microbiome is closely associated with the health and disease of the human host. Machine learning models have recently utilized the human microbiome to predict health conditions and disease status. Quantifying predictive uncertainty is essential for the reliable application of these microbiome-based prediction models in clinical settings. However, uncertainty quantification in such prediction models remains unexplored. In this study, we have developed a probabilistic prediction model using a Gaussian process (GP) with a kernel function that incorporates microbial community dissimilarities. We evaluated the performance of probabilistic prediction across three regression tasks: chronological age, body mass index, and disease severity, using publicly available human gut microbiome datasets. The results demonstrated that our model outperformed existing methods in terms of probabilistic prediction accuracy. Furthermore, we found that the confidence levels closely matched the empirical coverage and that data points predicted with lower uncertainty corresponded to lower prediction errors. These findings suggest that GP regression models incorporating community dissimilarities effectively capture the characteristics of phylogenetic, high-dimensional, and sparse microbial abundance data. Our study provides a more reliable framework for microbiome-based prediction, potentially advancing the application of microbiome data in health monitoring and disease diagnosis in clinical settings. Availability and implementation: The code is available at https://github.com/asahiadachi/gp4microbiome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.