ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Mitigating perioperative pressure injuries in microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure injuries (PI) that develop in the operating room (OR) account for just under half of all hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) and contribute significantly to the high cost and patient morbidity of HAPI. Microvascular autologous breast reconstruction poses specific risks to PI development in patients and should be addressed by the reconstructive microsurgeon. Standard risk factors for perioperative PI include patient immobility, absent pain perception, and challenges to maintaining normal body temperature while under general anesthesia for surgery. Specific intraoperative risk factors relevant to patients undergoing microvascular autologous breast reconstruction include extended length of surgery and patient repositioning. The risk of PI increases significantly when operative time exceeds 3 h and patient repositioning, with changes in positioning subjecting specific anatomic locations to increased pressure and friction. For these reasons, placement of positioning devices at high-risk anatomical locations is particularly important, such as the use of polyurethane or polyether mattresses, multilayered silicone foam dressings, and gel, foam, or fluidized positioners. The implementation of periodic body positioning checks and clear communication between surgical teams regarding awareness and status of pressure points is helpful in mitigating risk of perioperative PI. Preoperative risk assessments and skin exams may also be useful, as well as postoperative skin exams and early movement out of bed on postoperative day 0 and ambulation on postoperative day 1. These guidelines will reduce the risk of PI development in patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.