Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110538›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2023

Statistical analysis plan for the Petal trial: the effects of parental touch on relieving acute procedural pain in neonates.

Luke Baxter, Annalisa G V Hauck, Aomesh Bhatt, Maria M Cobo, Caroline Hartley, Simon Marchant, Ravi Poorun, Marianne van der Vaart, Rebeccah Slater

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04901611 (A Randomised Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effects of Parental Touch on Relieving Acute Procedural Pain in Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04901611 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effects of Parental Touch on Relieving Acute Procedural Pain in Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorPaediatric Neuroimaging Research GroupRan2021 to 2023Enrolled112ConditionsInfant Development, Pain, Procedural, ParentsArmsParental touch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luke Baxter *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9548-7162
Annalisa G V Hauck *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6853-8363
Aomesh BhattDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Maria M CoboDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3961-1568
Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Simon MarchantDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-5441
Ravi PoorunUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK.
Marianne van der Vaart *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-8719
Rebeccah Slater *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-4846

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infants undergo multiple clinically-required painful procedures during their time in hospital, and there is an increasing desire from both parents and clinical staff to have parents directly involved in their newborn's pain relief. To avoid biases due to selective analysis and reporting, a clinical trial's statistical analysis plan (SAP) should be finalised and registered prior to dataset lock and unblinding. Here, we outline the SAP for the Petal trial, which was registered on the ISRCTN registry prior to dataset lock and unblinding. Methods: The Petal trial is a multicentre, individually randomised, parallel-group interventional superiority trial. The study involves in-patient neonates born at or after 35+0 weeks gestation with a postnatal age of ≤7 days, in two hospital research sites (John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK). The primary objective is to investigate the potential efficacy of a non-pharmacological parent-led stroking intervention on reducing the magnitude of neonates' noxious stimulus-evoked brain activity. The primary outcome is the neonate's brain activity recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) in response to a heel lance blood sampling procedure. Secondary outcomes include neonatal clinical pain scores and tachycardia, and parental anxiety. The study hypothesis is neonates' pain responses and parents' anxiety scores are lower in the intervention group. Randomisation will be via a minimisation algorithm to maintain balance in five prognostic factors. Conclusions: Paediatric pain trials have been highlighted by regulatory bodies as an important and challenging topic, with interest increasing in brain imaging outcomes. The Petal trial, to which this SAP relates, is part of a larger effort of establishing a brain-based EEG outcome measure of infant pain for use in clinical trials. This SAP is thus likely to be of interest to those in academia, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04901611, 25/05/2021; ISRCTN: ISRCTN14135962, 23/08/2021).

Indexed as

analgesiabiomarkernociceptionPIPP-RRCTstroking

Identifiers

PMID40110538
PMCPMC11920693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.