ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Outcomes of MicroPulse
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation using the original and revised pars plana probe.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using different sweep velocity in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effect of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) on anterior segment properties in glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MicroPulse Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 122 consecutive eyes of 99 glaucoma patients who received MP-TLT with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome was success at 12 months, defined as final IOP <18 mm Hg and either IOP reduction of >20% or any medication reduction, without any adverse events or secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) within 12 months. Results: Ninety-five eyes in 75 patients were treated with the original probe, and 27 eyes of 24 patients were treated with the revised probe. The mean total energy and fluence used were 113.6 joules (J) and 54.3 J/cm Conclusion and clinical significance: The revised probe for the MP3 device may result in an improved and longer-lasting IOP-lowering effect compared to the original probe, while maintaining an excellent safety profile. How to cite this article: Ramachandran M, Voss J, Ferrell J,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.