Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110501›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

The Opioid-Sparing Effects of Intraoperative Esketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine During Laparoscopic Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial.

Wenjun Wang, Yanxin Chen, Guanzhu Li, Ying Chen, Jianwei Wu, Yongyong Shi, Min Zhong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjun Wang *Department of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0007-0391-2848
Yanxin Chen *The second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China; Department of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China; Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-3317
Guanzhu LiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jianwei WuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yongyong ShiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Min ZhongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8759-7983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, opioid-sparing (OS) interventions have been proposed to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery for patients. However, the advantages of OS anesthesia strategy in laparoscopic abdominal major surgery are still unknown. Methods: 157 patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: Remi (77, remifentanil) and OS (80, esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine), the drugs were administered at 0.2-0.5 mg/kg/h (remifentanil or esketamine) and 0.2-0.7μg/kg/h (remifentanil or dexmedetomidine) in two syringes, respectively The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score on postoperative day (POD)1. The proportion of rescue analgesia within 48 h, extubation time, postoperative quality recover scale (PQRS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) on POD30 were also recorded. Results: In the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), the NRS pain score and the proportion of rescue analgesia in Remi group was significantly higher than that in OS group (3 [1 to 3] vs 1 [1 to 3], Conclusion: In this study, OS anesthesia strategy during laparoscopic major abdominal surgery decreases the NRS pain scores in PACU and reduces the use of rescue analgesia, though it may prolong the extubation time and increase the proportion of dreaminess during hospitalization. Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2200060130.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineKetamineLaparoscopyPostoperative PainAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemifentanilAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineEsketamineKetamineRemifentanildexmedetomidineesketaminelaparoscopic major abdominal surgeryopioid-sparing anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40110501
PMCPMC11920631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.