ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
Evaluation of patient-perceived fatigue in multiple sclerosis utilizing the Finnish MS registry.
Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-reported quality of life related to cognitive function and fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2025Article
- Finnish Registry-Based Protocol for Screening and Management of Fatigue and Cognitive Problems in Multiple Sclerosis: Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Observational
- Feasibility of a registry-integrated eHealth program for managing fatigue and cognitive problems in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize patient-perceived fatigue by using the Finnish Multiple Sclerosis (MS) registry data. Materials & Methods: Fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and the Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue. Disease severity was evaluated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale and symptoms with the Visual Analogue Scales. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) included the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire, the Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimensions, the 15 D, and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. For the purposes of the study, patients were classified to those without (FSS ≤ 4) and those with (FSS ≥ 5) fatigue. The FSS scores were correlated with the results of other PROs. Results: Based on the 512 FSS scores, 47% of the patients reported fatigue (FSS ≥ 5). Fatigue was related to higher disability, lower education, and smoking. FSS correlated significantly with other measures of fatigue, cognitive, and mood symptoms, and was associated with lower Quality of Life. Conclusions: As an invisible and debilitating symptom fatigue should be evaluated systematically. In the screening, it is important to recognize the characteristics of the different scales. Whereas the FSS may serve as an overall screen, the FSMC may help to identify aspects of cognitive and motor fatigue separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.