ReviewOncology reviews2025
Ultrasound in endometrial cancer: evaluating the impact of pre-surgical staging.
Review in Oncology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A preoperative nomogram integrating transvaginal ultrasound endometrial thickness and nutritional, inflammatory, and metabolic indicators for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Predictive value of deep myometrial invasion for lymph node metastasis in low-grade endometrioid carcinoma and its implications for surgical decision-making.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Clinical value of D-dimer combined with transvaginal ultrasonography in the postmenopausal population with endometrial carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preoperative staging in endometrial cancer has recently been implied as an important factor in accurately selecting low-risk cases, ultimately avoiding unnecessary lymph node debulking. Transvaginal ultrasound seems promising in clinical staging as it offers the possibility to assess the depth of myometrial infiltration and cervical stromal invasion. This commonly available, non-invasive, and low-cost modality serves as an accurate alternative to MRI, especially in middle- and low-income countries, where MRI may not be promptly available and cost is an important issue. This review aims to summarize the progressive role of clinical implementation of pelvic ultrasonography in the locoregional staging of endometrial carcinoma and to compare its accuracy with other preoperative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.