ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Comparison of the Sealability of Four Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Materials in Repairing of Furcal Perforation of the Deciduous Teeth: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Sealing Ability of Biodentine, Biostructure Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Theracal LC, and Bio-C Repair as Perforation Repair Material: An Inverted Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopic Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Obturation quality analysis of furcation perforations repaired with different magnifications and biomaterials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- In vitro comparison of root canal obturation quality in primary molars using lentulo spiral and reverse rotary techniques with zinc oxide eugenol and endoflas: microcomputed tomography analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Furcal perforation is one of the main causes of failure in endodontic treatments, and these perforations have a poor prognosis. The best choice for sealing perforations is bioceramic materials. The aim of this study was to compare the sealability of four mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) materials. Materials and methods: In this Results: The highest dye absorbance was related to the positive control group (0.09 ± 0.002). Among bioceramic materials, the highest mean value was observed in the AGM group (0.06 ± 0.004), and the lowest was seen in the MTA Angelus group (0.02 ± 0.004). There was a significant difference in dye absorbance between these groups ( Conclusion: Sealability of MTA Angelus was greater than that of other bioceramic materials. The lowest sealability was seen in AGM MTA. Thus, AGM MTA is not probably a good alternative in sealing furcation perforations. How to cite this article: Mehdipour A, Heidari F, Nattaj MH,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.