Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Identification of diagnostic biomarkers of and immune cell infiltration analysis in bovine respiratory disease.

Hui Sheng, Junxing Zhang, Xiaodi Shi, Long Zhang, Dawei Yao, Peipei Zhang, Yupeng Li, Jinlong Zhang, Xiaofei Guo, Xiaosheng Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui Sheng *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Junxing Zhang *College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaodi ShiTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Long ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Dawei YaoTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Peipei ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Yupeng LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Jinlong ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Xiaofei GuoTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Xiaosheng ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Breeding and Biotechnology, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Animal Healthy Farming, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a prevalent and costly condition in the cattle industry, impacting long-term productivity, antibioticusage, and global food safety. Thus, identifying reliable biomarkers for BRD is crucial for early diagnosis, effective treatment, and monitoring therapeutic outcomes. Methods: This study identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with BRD by analyzing a blood RNA-seq expression dataset associated with BRD, and conducted a Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) approach enrichment and Gene Ontology (GO) annotation analysis on these DEGs. Meanwhile, the key modules related to BRD were screened by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and the genes in the module were intersected with DEGs. Subequently, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest (RF) analysis were employed to identify potential biomarkers. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to explore the potential mechanisms of the identified biomarkers, and their diagnostic significance was assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In addition, immune cell infiltration in BRD was evaluated using the CIBERSORT algorithm and the correlation between biomarkers and immune cell infiltration was analyzed. Results: The results showed that a total of 1,097 DEG were screened. GO and KEGG analysis showed that DEGs was mainly enriched in inflammatory response, defense response, Complement and coagulation cascades and Antigen processing and presentation pathways. WGCNA analysis determined that the cyan module had the highest correlation with BRD. A total of 833 overlapping genes were identified through Venn analysis of the differential and WGCNA results. Lasso and RF analyses identified five potential biomarkers for BRD. RT-qPCR testing and data set analysis showed that the expression levels of these five potential biomarkers in nasal mucus and blood of BRD cattle were significantly higher than those of healthy cattle. In addition, ROC curve analysis showed that potential biomarkers had high diagnostic value. GSEA analysis revealed that potential biomarkers are mainly involved in Neutrophil extracellular trap formation, Complement and coagulation cascades, T cell receptor signaling pathway, B cell receptor signaling pathway, Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis and IL-17 signaling pathway. The results from the CIBERSORT algorithm demonstrated a significant difference in immune cell composition between the BRD group and the healthy group, indicating that the diagnostic biomarkers were closely associated with immune cells. Conclusion: This study identified ADGRG3, CDKN1A, CA4, GGT5, and SLC26A8 as potential diagnostic markers for BRD, providing significant insights for the development of new immunotherapy targets and improving disease prevention and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

bovine respiratory diseaseCIBERSORTimmune infiltrationlifetime productivitypotential biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40110435
PMCPMC11921050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.