Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Development of SYBR green I-based real-time qPCR differential diagnosis assays for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus typing in Guangdong province.

Zhaowen Ren, Pu Kang, Pian Zhang, Chenglong Sun, Jing Chen, Hua Xiang, Shengjun Luo, Rujian Cai, Yuan Huang, Yuzhu Jin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhaowen Ren *Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Pu Kang *Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Pian Zhang *Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Chenglong SunDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Jing ChenGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hua XiangGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shengjun LuoGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Rujian CaiGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan HuangGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yuzhu JinJiaozuo City Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center, Jiaozuo, China.
Gang WangGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohu WangGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention, Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is a highly contagious disease that causes reproductive disorders in sows and respiratory problems in pigs of different ages. It first appeared in the late 20th century in the United States and Europe before spreading globally, leading to significant economic losses in the swine industry. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) has a high rate of genetic recombination, resulting in considerable genetic diversity within the virus. The lack of cross-protection between different lineages often leads to unsuccessful vaccination attempts. Methods: To accurately distinguish PRRSV lineages and develop effective vaccination strategies for pigs, we have developed a fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) method by designing specific primers and SYBR green dye. This method allows for the simultaneous identification of different PRRSV genotypes. Results: Our experimental results show that these methods have good specificity and do not react with other common viral pathogens in pigs. This method also demonstrates good sensitivity, with the ability to detect low levels of the virus. The detection limits of these assay were 10 Discussion: Our method provides a quick way to identify PRRSV genotypes in pig herds in Guangdong, which has certain significance for developing effective vaccination strategies against PRRS.

Indexed as

differential diagnosisduplex real-time PCRphylogenetic analysisprevalencePRRSV

Identifiers

PMID40110430
PMCPMC11921047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.