ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025
Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice.
Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social hierarchy shapes behavioral and transcriptional responses to chronic stress and ketamine in male mice.iScience · 2026Article
- Region-specific neural activity changes and hierarchical instability following social isolation.iScience · 2026Article
- Closed-crown packaging system for stable, long-term neural recording in group-housed mice.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Chronic Unpredictable Stress Impairs Social Behaviour in Adult Male Rats: Correlations with Dopamine and Serotonin Levels.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Inhibition of the lateral hypothalamus emboldens adult female spiny mice to huddle with an established group of novel peers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Establishing a social behavior paradigm for female mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social hierarchy refers to the set of social ranks in a group of animals where individuals can gain priority access to resources through repeated social interactions. Key mechanisms involved in this process include conflict, social negotiation, prior experience, and physical advantages. The establishment and maintenance of social hierarchies not only promote group stability and well-being but also shape individual social behaviors by fostering cooperation and reducing conflict. Existing research indicates that social hierarchy is closely associated with immune responses, neural regulation, metabolic processes, and endocrine functions. These physiological systems collectively modulate an individual's sensitivity to stress and influence adaptive responses, thereby playing a critical role in the development of psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. This review summarizes the primary behavioral methods used to assess social dominance in mice, evaluates their applicability and limitations, and discusses potential improvements. Additionally, it explores the underlying neural mechanisms associated with these methods to deepen our understanding of their biological basis. By critically assessing existing methodologies and proposing refinements, this study aims to provide a systematic reference framework and methodological guidance for future research, facilitating a more comprehensive exploration of the neural mechanisms underlying social behavior. The role of sex differences in social hierarchy formation remains underexplored. Most studies focus predominantly on males, while the distinct social strategies and physiological mechanisms of females are currently overlooked. Future studies should place greater emphasis on evaluating social hierarchy in female mice to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of sex-specific social behaviors and their impact on group structure and individual health. Advances in automated tracking technologies may help address this gap by improving behavioral assessments in female mice. Future research may also benefit from integrating physiological data (e.g., hormone levels) to gain deeper insights into the relationships between social status, stress regulation, and mental health. Additionally, developments in artificial intelligence and deep learning could enhance individual recognition and behavioral analysis, potentially reducing reliance on chemical markers or implanted devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.