Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110389›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice.

Hao Zheng, Dantong Chen, Zilong Zhong, Ziyi Li, Meng Yuan, Zhenkun Zhang, Xiaoping Zhou, Guohui Zhu, Hongwei Sun, Lin Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hao ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Dantong ChenClinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Zilong ZhongDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Ziyi LiClinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Meng YuanDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Zhenkun ZhangClinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Xiaoping ZhouNetwork Information Center, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Guohui ZhuDepression Treatment Center, Weifang Mental Health Center, Weifang, China.
Hongwei SunDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.
Lin SunDepartment of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social hierarchy refers to the set of social ranks in a group of animals where individuals can gain priority access to resources through repeated social interactions. Key mechanisms involved in this process include conflict, social negotiation, prior experience, and physical advantages. The establishment and maintenance of social hierarchies not only promote group stability and well-being but also shape individual social behaviors by fostering cooperation and reducing conflict. Existing research indicates that social hierarchy is closely associated with immune responses, neural regulation, metabolic processes, and endocrine functions. These physiological systems collectively modulate an individual's sensitivity to stress and influence adaptive responses, thereby playing a critical role in the development of psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. This review summarizes the primary behavioral methods used to assess social dominance in mice, evaluates their applicability and limitations, and discusses potential improvements. Additionally, it explores the underlying neural mechanisms associated with these methods to deepen our understanding of their biological basis. By critically assessing existing methodologies and proposing refinements, this study aims to provide a systematic reference framework and methodological guidance for future research, facilitating a more comprehensive exploration of the neural mechanisms underlying social behavior. The role of sex differences in social hierarchy formation remains underexplored. Most studies focus predominantly on males, while the distinct social strategies and physiological mechanisms of females are currently overlooked. Future studies should place greater emphasis on evaluating social hierarchy in female mice to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of sex-specific social behaviors and their impact on group structure and individual health. Advances in automated tracking technologies may help address this gap by improving behavioral assessments in female mice. Future research may also benefit from integrating physiological data (e.g., hormone levels) to gain deeper insights into the relationships between social status, stress regulation, and mental health. Additionally, developments in artificial intelligence and deep learning could enhance individual recognition and behavioral analysis, potentially reducing reliance on chemical markers or implanted devices.

Indexed as

behavioral assessmenthierarchymental disordersresource competitionsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID40110389
PMCPMC11920152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.