ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Efficacy and Safety of Ophthalmic Steroids in the Management of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This review aims to clarify the role of ophthalmic steroids in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) treatment. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, and manual searches. The primary outcome was changes in best-corrected visual acuity. The secondary outcomes were anatomical changes and incidence of adverse events. Results: Of the 100 articles identified, 9 studies were included: six treatment-naive studies, two anti-VEGF resistant studies, and one involving hemorrhagic retinal detachment. Triamcinolone acetonide was administered in seven studies, and dexamethasone in two. Altogether, 194 eyes received ophthalmic steroids in the form of intravitreal solution and slow-released implant. Overall, eight out of nine studies revealed visual acuity improvement from baseline to final follow-up, although only two studies reported significant results (0.33 ± 0.29 logMAR and 0.66 ± 0.28 logMAR) to final follow-up (0.16 ± 0.27 logMAR and 0.36 ± 0.31 logMAR). Adverse events were documented in six studies, with cataracts (6/96) and ocular hypertension (10/96) being the most common. Polyp regression and pigment epithelial detachment rates demonstrated a decline ranging from 50% to 100%. The maximum reduction observed in the central foveal thickness and central retinal thickness was -131.4 μm and -261.7 μm, respectively. Conclusion: Ophthalmic steroids may serve as an effective adjunctive treatment for PCV patients, irrespective of anti-VEGF resistance or hemorrhagic involvement, and may be considered as a potential monotherapy in resource-limited settings, with minimal side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.