Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110361›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025

Clinical outcomes and risk factors for local failure and visual impairment in patients treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma.

L J Pors, M Marinkovic, H H Deuzeman, T H K Vu, E M Kerkhof, K M van Wieringen-Warmenhoven, C R N Rasch, J C Bleeker, L S Koetsier, J W M Beenakker and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The optimal approach to the primary treatment of uveal melanoma: a narrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

L J PorsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
M MarinkovicDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
H H DeuzemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
T H K VuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
E M KerkhofDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
K M van Wieringen-WarmenhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
C R N RaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J C BleekerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
L S KoetsierDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J W M BeenakkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
G P M LuytenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
C L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
N HorewegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Small uveal melanomas are preferably treated with eye-sparing therapies such as brachytherapy or proton beam therapy. Knowledge of clinical outcomes and risk factors is important for personalized patient counselling. Materials and methods: Data of all choroidal melanoma patients treated at the Leiden University Medical Center between 2012-2019 with Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy were collected. Time-to-event analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, risk factors for local failure and visual acuity (VA) decline were identified using Cox proportional hazards models with predefined covariates. Results: 719 patients were included. Median tumour prominence and diameter were 3.8 mm and 11.6 mm, respectively. 52 % of tumours were centrally located, and 19 % were juxtapapillary. Five-year overall survival, eye retention and local failure rates were 83 %, 95 %, and 8 %, respectively. Juxtapapillary location, lower tumour apex doses, and T3-4 tumour stage were significantly associated with local failure. Patients with juxtapapillary tumours had 20 % risk of local failure. Five years posttreatment, 47 % of patients had no functional visual impairment (Snellen VA ≥ 0.5). Lasting functional visual impairment was associated with baseline vision, central tumours, and scleral dose. Patients with central tumours had 75 % risk of mild or worse visual impairment after 5 years. Conclusion: Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy yields good local control and visual outcomes in patients with choroidal melanoma. Juxtapapillary tumours have a high risk of local failure and alternative therapies should be considered in these patients, if available. Patients with central tumours, and those with decreased pre-treatment vision should be counselled on the risk of visual impairment.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyNeoplasm recurrence, LocalUveal melanomaVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID40110361
PMCPMC11919603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.