Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110355›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Foliar fungi-imposed costs to plant productivity moderate shifts in composition of the rhizosphere microbiome.

Brett R Lane, Molly A Kuhs, Max M Zaret, Zewei Song, Elizabeth T Borer, Eric W Seabloom, Daniel C Schlatter, Linda L Kinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brett R LaneDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Molly A KuhsDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Max M ZaretDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Zewei SongDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Elizabeth T BorerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Eric W SeabloomDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Daniel C SchlatterPlant Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), St. Paul, MN, United States.
Linda L KinkelDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants in grasslands navigate a complex landscape of interactions including competition for resources and defense against pathogens. Foliar fungi can suppress plant growth directly through pathogenic interactions, or indirectly via host growth-defense tradeoffs. The exclusion of foliar fungi allows the reallocation of resources from defense to growth and reproduction. In addition, plants also invest photosynthates in rhizodeposition, or root exudates, which play a significant role in shaping the rhizosphere microbial community. However, it remains unclear what impact the exclusion of foliar fungi has on the allocation of resources to rhizodeposition and the composition of the rhizosphere microbial community. Using a 6-year foliar fungicide study in plots planted with 16 species of native prairie plants, we asked whether foliar fungi influence the rhizosphere microbial composition of a common prairie grass (

Indexed as

plant-microbe interactionsproductivityrhizodepositionrhizosphere microbiomesoil ecology

Identifiers

PMID40110355
PMCPMC11921152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.