Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110329›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Comparing the accuracy and safety of automated CO

Ali Afsharirad, Sepide Javankiani, Morteza Noparast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali AfshariradDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepide JavankianiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza NoparastDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic angiography of peripheral arteries using carbon dioxide (CO Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 35 patients with PVD and CLI and performed both CO Results: In this study, a total of 35 patients (19 male) with an average age of 56.91 ± 10.73 were examined. Among them, 13 patients (37.1%) had involvement in the femoral region, 8 patients (22.9%) in the popliteal region, 8 patients (22.9%) in the tibial region, and 6 patients (17.1%) in the foot region. CO Discussion: The study concluded that the use of CO

Indexed as

angioplastyautomated CO2 angiographyiodine angiographyperipheral arterial disease

Identifiers

PMID40110329
PMCPMC11918752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.