Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110314›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

The effect of propranolol on cesarean section rate in prolonged labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oadi N Shrateh, Ashna Habib, Zainab Nazir, Zahraa M M Zeer, Tooba Ali, Saleh Matter, Sadeq F S Tanina, Mashhour Naasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oadi N ShratehFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Ashna HabibDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zainab NazirDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zahraa M M ZeerFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Tooba AliDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saleh MatterMinistry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine.
Sadeq F S TaninaMinistry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine.
Mashhour NaasanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Propranolol is widely recognized as a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blocker known to enhance uterine activity in both pregnant and non-pregnant women. Prolonged labor and serious concerns about maternal and neonatal health prompted us to investigate medical issues. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of propranolol on cesarean deliveries during prolonged labor. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 1 November 2023. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients receiving intrapartum propranolol during prolonged labor. Unadjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed-effects model. The I Results: Of the 704 identified articles, six were included in the meta-analyses. There was a significant difference in cesarean deliveries between propranolol and placebo (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.09, Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, a notable reduction in cesarean rates was observed when propranolol was given to women in prolonged labor. The results of this meta-analysis show that the use of propranolol safely reduces the need for cesarean deliveries due to labor arrest disorders.

Indexed as

cesarean deliveryintrapartum carelabor augmentationprotracted labor

Identifiers

PMID40110314
PMCPMC11918637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.