ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
A rare case of Takayasu arteritis with aortic dissection in a young male patient presented with hypertensive urgency.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a granulomatous, large vessel inflammation characterized by occlusion, stenosis or aneurysm of the aorta and its branches. Aortic dissection (AD) is one of the rare manifestations of TA, which can present as uncontrolled hypertension. This case illustrates the severe rare cardiovascular complication that arises in a 21-year male patient with TA, including hypertensive urgency, AD and significant renal artery involvement. Case presentation: A 21-year-old male presented with complaints of fever, malaise and dizziness. On clinical examinations, a discrepancy in blood pressure was noted in bilateral arms. All the laboratory parameters were within normal limits. Echocardiography confirmed moderate concentric hypertrophy with Grade II diastolic dysfunction and a preserved ejection fraction. To rule out secondary causes of hypertension, an arterial Doppler was done, which showed features of renal artery stenosis and stenosis in the descending aorta. CTA revealed an intimal tear/dissection in the thoracoabdominal aorta consistent with Stanford Type B AD. Clinical discussion: Based on clinical presentation and imaging findings, large vessel vasculitis such as TA or giant cell arteritis (GCA) was suspected. Later, TA was diagnosed using the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for TA. The patient had rapid symptomatic improvement using antihypertensive drugs, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Conclusion: This explains rare manifestation of TA in a young male patient with normal inflammatory markers and underlying AD with hypertensive urgency. In those suspected with TA, screening for life threatening conditions such as AD should be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.