ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Short-term mortality and readmission rate prediction by the sequential organ failure assessment score in acute decompensated heart failure.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data on the use of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) in patients with cardiovascular disease are increasing. Several studies demonstrated that the SOFA score can identify short-term mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study was conducted to determine the prognostic value of the admission SOFA score in patients hospitalized for ADHF and to assess its ability in predicting the 30-day readmission rate. Materials and methods: This study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2023 at our institution. A total of 216 patients were included in the study, and the SOFA score was calculated for all patients. Results: The average SOFA score is 3.14 ± 2.67, of which SOFA scores of ≤1, 2-3, and ≥4 account for 34.3%, 27.8%, and 37.9% of the total score, respectively. During the 30-day follow-up period, there were 22 cases of death from all causes (10.2%), of which in-hospital mortality accounted for 9.7%. Patients with all-cause mortality had higher SOFA scores than the survivors (7.32 ± 2.93 and 2.66 ± 2.12, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the SOFA score is 0.897 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.830-0.964] for 30-day mortality. The SOFA score was also compared with other validated risk scores, namely, the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score and the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) score. In this study cohort, the SOFA score demonstrates superior predictive accuracy to the GWTG-HF and ADHERE scores [the AUCs when predicting 30-day mortality are 0.769 (95% CI = 0.676-0.862) and 0.789 (95% CI = 0.705-0.873), respectively]. Conclusion: The SOFA score might be used to screen high-risk patients for optimization strategy in the treatment of ADHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.