ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Assessing the influence of rapid diagnostic test (RDT) accuracy on malaria misdiagnosis and antimalarial resistance in Nigeria.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic gaps in light microscopy for malaria case management and control in Dilla Zuria Health Facility, southern Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Malaria in the 21st Century: Global Disease Burden, Epidemiological Insights, and Strategic Control Approaches.Biology · 2026Review
- False-positive and false-negative malaria rapid diagnostic test results: evidence from a nationally representative survey of children in Ghana.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Screener Application in Screening for Malaria Parasites Among Blood Donors at the Korle-Bu Blood Bank, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of recording and reporting of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria.Malaria journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains a critical health challenge in tropical regions, demanding accurate and timely diagnosis to prevent severe negative outcomes. The disease's misdiagnosis, driven by inadequate diagnostic tools, insufficient training, and systemic health care deficiencies, complicates effective management. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), commonly used in Africa, often produce false-negative results due to various factors like parasite density and test conditions, which can lead to inappropriate treatment and potential drug resistance. Microscopy, while the gold standard, is often unavailable in resource-limited settings, pushing reliance on less accurate methods. Technological advances and improved education for health care workers are important for diagnostic accuracy. Innovations such as the Nanomal DNA analyzer, a point-of-care device, offer quick, reliable testing and the potential to identify drug resistance markers. The accuracy of malaria treatment can be significantly improved by integrating clinical assessments with refined diagnostic methods, reducing the disease burden in endemic areas. This comprehensive approach, combining technology, systemic health care improvements, and policy alignment, is important for effective malaria management and eventual eradication in affected regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.